Almost everything written about Act 60 stops at "183 days." That is one of five conditions in the presence test, any one of which satisfies it — and the presence test is itself one of three tests for bona fide residency. Here is the whole of it, with the government source beside each rule.
TrackedPR records and organises days. It does not determine residency, and nothing on this page is tax or legal advice.
Anyone claiming bona fide residency of Puerto Rico for a tax year — which includes every holder of an Act 60 decree, but is not limited to them. The test is federal. It comes from the Internal Revenue Code and its regulations, not from the decree, and it would apply to you if you moved here with no decree at all.
That is worth being clear about, because the two get conflated constantly. Your decree sets out what Puerto Rico grants you and what it asks in return. The presence test decides whether the federal government treats you as a resident of Puerto Rico in the first place. Satisfying one has never satisfied the other.
Bona fide residency requires all three, every year:
Days are the only one of the three that is arithmetic. The other two are answered with documents and facts about your life, which is why the evidence side takes longer to build than the day count and is the half people leave until it is urgent.
You satisfy the presence test by meeting any one of these. They are alternatives, not a checklist — a point that the ubiquitous "183 days" shorthand hides completely.
You were present in Puerto Rico for at least 183 days during the tax year.
The one everybody has heard of, and the only one most people ever use. It is a count of days, not of nights, and a day you touched the island at any point counts.
You were present in Puerto Rico for at least 549 days across the tax year and the two years before it, with at least 60 days in each of those 3 years.
549 over 3 years averages exactly 183 a year, so this is not a lighter requirement — it is the same one, measured across a longer window. What it buys you is that a single thin year need not sink you, provided the years either side carry it and no year falls below 60.
You were present in the United States for no more than 90 days during the tax year.
Note what this does not ask: it sets no floor on days in Puerto Rico at all. Someone who spent the year travelling abroad and barely landed in the US can satisfy the presence test on this condition alone — and then still fail bona fide residency on the other two tests.
You had no more than $3,000 of earned income in the United States for the year, and were present for more days in Puerto Rico than in the United States.
Earned income, not investment income — the distinction is the whole point of the condition, and it is worth confirming which of yours is which with your CPA rather than assuming.
You had no significant connection to the United States during the tax year.
"Significant connection" is defined, narrowly and specifically, rather than judged. The three things that create one are listed below.
The fifth condition turns on a defined term. You have a significant connection to the United States if any one of these is true:
A day of presence is not a night, and it is not a full day. These rules add to your Puerto Rico count:
And these days are not counted against you as United States presence:
The regulation carries a few further exclusions — certain students, government officials, and professional athletes at charitable events — narrow enough that they are better read at the source than paraphrased here.
The medical and disaster rules above are the two that most often decide a close year, and both are narrower than their names suggest — what actually qualifies covers what counts, what does not, and what to keep.
Satisfies the presence test on the first condition, with 5 days to spare. Worth noticing how little slack a May arrival really leaves: 43 days of travel is the whole year's budget, and 38 of them are already spent.
The presence test is satisfied — on the third condition, not the first. Bona fide residency is a separate question, and the Miami apartment is doing double damage: kept furnished and available year-round it is a permanent home in the United States, which both rules out the fifth condition and counts against them in the closer connection test they must also pass. Clearing the day test is not the finish line, and this is the case that shows why.
Fails every condition for that tax year. This is the ordinary case, not a cautionary one — a late-year move usually means the clock starts on the following year, and knowing that in August is far better than discovering it in April.
To run the first example against your own arrival date, the move calculator does exactly that arithmetic — days left in the year, measured against 183, with no account needed.
Every condition above is a count of days, and a count is only as good as the record behind it. The number is easy; being able to show where it came from, two years later, to someone who is asking, is the hard part — and it is what TrackedPR exists to produce. How it works covers the day-to-day of that, and the FAQ answers what counts as proof of a day.
Two of the day rules above are the ones no spreadsheet handles well, and both are in the app: days away for qualifying medical treatment, and days you could not get back after a declared disaster. They are flagged as what they are rather than silently added, because a day that needs an explanation should carry one.
The record is easiest to build while the year is still happening.
Start tracking freeIf your worldwide gross income tops $75,000 in the year your residency status changes, Form 8898 is a separate filing obligation with its own $1,000 penalty. Ask your CPA about it early — it is not part of this test.
Everything stated as a rule on this page comes from one of these. Where our wording and the government's differ, theirs governs.